Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Fam Stud. 2016 Jun 3;23(1):38–61. doi: 10.1080/13229400.2016.1176588

Table 3.

Percentages of parents endorsing supplied justifications for why learning to apologize is not important

Transgression type → Intentional Moral
Accidental Moral
Conventional
Parenting category →
% rating apologies as not important →
AV
4%
AN
3%
P
5%
AV
7%
AN
9%
P
21%
AV
41%
AN
44%
P
65%
Learning apology isn’t important because (statistics below include only those parents who rated apologies as not important)
For amends, actions better than words 67% 60% 57% 40% 24% 53% 38% 38% 44%
Adults should let kids work it out 0% 20% 29% 20% 18% 33% 41% 36% 56%
I want child to solve problems in own way 17% 40% 29% 30% 12% 40% 40% 34% 36%
It’s kids being kids; no big deal 0% 20% 0% 20% 12% 10% 31% 29% 33%
Caring is important, but apologies not vital 33% 0% 57% 10% 35% 47% 12% 3% 15%
Apologies aren’t effective; they’re just words 33% 20% 71% 0% 0% 20% 3% 2% 12%
My focus would be more on punishing child 17% 20% 0% 0% 0% 10% 3% 1% 1%
No one was hurt in this scenario N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 29% 22% 23%
It was a mistake; no apology necessary N/A N/A N/A 40% 35% 37% N/A N/A N/A

Note. AV = authoritative. AN = authoritarian. P = permissive. Parenting groups were formally compared on each item within the conventional transgression type only, due to low-frequency responding in the other transgression types. Comparisons were not carried out across transgression types. Initial ANOVAs were conducted with alphas set at .005, and none of the omnibus p-values was < .005 (thus, post hoc analyses were not conducted for the Conventional scenario).