Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 13;7(4):1225–1237. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.038711

Table 3. Methylation changes in or around genes in response to copy number changes of homeologs.

Gene Genome CS N7A\T7B N7A\T7D N7B\T7A N7B\T7D N7D\T7A N7D\T7B Dt7AS Dt7AL Dt7BS Dt7BL Dt7DS
WSU101 U 19 19 19 19, 5 18.5 19 7.8 19
WSU102 A 12 12 1 12 12 5 12 12 14
WSU103 B 18 20 18 2 18 18 12 18 18 18
WSU104 A 10 10 10 10 18 8 10 10 10
WSU105 A 18 17.8 1 18 18 18 18 18
WSU107 U 7.8 8 0 18 7.8 7.8
BF291511 A 19 1 17 19 7.8 19 19 19 19
BF202806 D 6 6 10 17 8 6 6
BF202806 B 5 5 5 6 5 5 6 5 5 5
BG274496 U 1 5 19 19 7.8
BE490149 B 17 12 17 9 17 17 17 17 17
BE490149 U 6 17
BE591273 U 7.8 10 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8
BF474382 U 17.6 19 19 15
RZ476 U 18, 17.5 17.5 18 12 17.5 10 17.5 10

“Gene” shows the genes or ESTs that showed a difference in methylation pattern in response to copy number change; “genome” shows the genome, copy of which is showing the methylation difference; nullisomic–tetrasomic and ditelosomic lines are marked using the standard nomenclature. The numbers in the table are the sizes of the fragment bands in approximate kilobases, estimated using the size standard during the gel-blot analysis. CS, Chinese spring.