Table 4.

QTL analysis by interval mapping (parametric test) and mapping information for fruit quality traits in a F1 Japanese plum progeny of “98–99” × “Angeleno.”.

Trait	Year	Parent	QTL	LG	IM_95% (cM)	Location	Nearest marker	LOD	PEV
Ripening time	2015	98–99	RT	4	[25.0; 52.4]	43.2	S4_11357872	6.73	46.3
	2015	ANG	RT	4	[17.7; 41.6]	36.1	S4_11357872	7.53	51.6
	2016	98–99	RT	4	[25.0; 52.0]	43.2	S4_11357872	6.51	63.2
	2016	ANG	RT	4	[17.0; 41.6]	36.1	S4_11357872	8.45	63.5
Chlorophyll index	2015	98–99	IAD_1-2	3	[19.2; 40.1]	35.7	S3_6856158	4.82	34.8
	2015	ANG	IAD_1-2	3	[17.2; 34]	32.1	S3_8549572	5.14	39.4
Skin color	2015	98–99	SKC	3	[43.2; 57.2]	49.7	S3_14698248	6.61	43.3
	2015	98–99	SKC	4	[25.0; 52.0]	42.1	S4_10872195	6.54	44.8
	2015	ANG	SKC	3	[48.3; 67.0]	53.8	S3_13359114	7.07	44.7
	2015	ANG	SKC	4	[17.7; 41.6]	31.1	S4_9700717	5.16	35.9
	2016	98–99	SKC	3	[40.1; 75.4]	45.6	S3_13221856	5.12	34.9
	2016	98–99	SKC	4	[27.1; 52.0]	42.1	S4_10872195	5.56	41.3
	2016	ANG	SKC	3	[39.0; 79.8]	52.3	S3_12879559	8.15	50.4
	2016	ANG	SKC	4	[21.0; 46.0]	38.8	S4_11967712	6.04	40.1
Over color	2015	98–99	OVC	4	[41.9; 42.1]	41.9	S4_10696055	5.1	33.3
	2015	ANG	OVC	3	[63.1; 63.8]	63.8	S3_14754388	3.68	67.6
	2016	98–99	OVC	4	[25.9; 59.6]	39.6	S4_10173649	9.21	55.6
	2016	ANG	OVC	4	[17.7; 41.6]	38.8	S4_11967712	8.01	48.9
Soluble solids	2015	98–99	SSC_2	1	[56.1; 74.3]	63.6	S1_19630503	3.70	27.1
	2015	98–99	SSC_1	6	[46.3; 47.5]	47.5	S6_22808265	3.61	31.3
	2015	ANG	SSC_2	1	[57.8; 58.5]	58.5	S1_16669374	3.71	27.8
	2015	ANG	SSC_1	6	[55.5; 57.0]	57.0	S6_23276829	4.25	28.7
Fruit weight	2016	98–99	FW	7	[74.0; 93.7]	74.2	S7_18296863	5.76	47.9
	2016	ANG	FW	7	[44.0; 65.4]	58.4	S7_20598519	5.79	39.0
Shape	2016	98–99	SHP	7	[74.0; 93.7]	74.2	S7_18296863	4.75	42.5
	2016	ANG	SHP	7	[35.2; 65.4]	61.9	S7_20956328	4.73	36.1

LG, linkage group; LOD, logarithm of odds; IM, interval mapping at LOD threshold ≤ 0.05.