Table 3.
Intercept and slope comparisons of internal browning vs. firmness regression analysis, between firmness category groups for non-dropped (0 cm) and dropped (32 cm) “Duke” and “Brigitta” blueberries, during seasons 2011/2012 (Y1) and 2012/2013 (Y2).
Cultivar | Drop height (cm) | Firmness category | Model comparisons (p-values) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y1 |
Y2 |
|||||
Intercept | Slope | Intercept | Slope | |||
“Duke” | 0 | Soft vs. medium | 0.273a | 0.746 | 0.304 | 0.902 |
Medium vs. firm | 0.035 | 0.572 | 0.779 | 0.045 | ||
Soft vs. firm | 0.840 | 0.783 | 0.152 | 0.066 | ||
32 | Soft vs. medium | 0.911 | 0.517 | 0.908 | 0.851 | |
Medium vs. firm | 0.164 | 0.492 | 0.007 | 0.702 | ||
Soft vs. firm | 0.576 | 0.877 | 0.001 | 0.870 | ||
“Brigitta” | 0 | Soft vs. medium | 0.000 | 0.443 | 0.019 | 0.691 |
Medium vs. firm | 0.148 | 0.399 | 0.678 | 0.558 | ||
Soft vs. firm | 0.007 | 0.954 | 0.126 | 0.689 | ||
32 | Soft vs. medium | 0.029 | 0.002 | 0.397 | 0.810 | |
Medium vs. firm | 0.346 | 0.000 | 0.148 | 0.081 | ||
Soft vs. firm | 0.783 | 0.370 | 0.146 | 0.034 |
aIn red, p-values lower than 0.05.