Table 2.
Univariable analysis | Multivariable analysis | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
HR (95% CI) | p value | HR (95% CI) | p value | |
ypN0 | Reference | 0.964 | Reference | 0.613 |
ypNitc/mi | 1.02 (0.52–1.99) | <0.001 | 1.38 (0.40–4.79) | 0.031 |
ypN1-3 | 1.89 (1.43–2.50) | 1.78 (1.06–3.00) | ||
Age (per year increment) | 1.02 (1.01–1.02) | 0.001 | 1.01 (0.99–1.02) | 0.479 |
ypT-stage | ||||
T0 or Tis | Reference | Reference | ||
T1-2 | 1.88 (1.31–2.70) | 0.001 | 2.73 (1.39–5.39) | 0.004 |
T3-4 | 3.74 (2.53–5.54) | <0.001 | 4.71 (2.35–9.43) | <0.001 |
Tumor type | ||||
Ductal | Reference | Reference | ||
Lobular | 0.78 (0.53–1.14) | 0.193 | 1.11 (0.59–2.07) | 0.751 |
Other | 0.89 (0.69–1.15) | 0.386 | 0.89 (0.58–1.37) | 0.595 |
Tumor grade | ||||
3 versus 1–2 | 1.64 (1.22–2.20) | 0.001 | 1.69 (1.19–2.40) | 0.004 |
Subtypes | ||||
ER+PR+Her2−: yes versus noa | 0.63 (0.50–0.80) | <0.001 | ||
ER+PR−Her2−: yes versus noa | 1.32 (0.99–1.75) | 0.057 | ||
ER+Her2+: yes versus noa,b | 0.63 (0.47–0.85) | 0.002 | ||
ER−Her2+: yes versus nob | 1.20 (0.95–1.53) | 0.129 | ||
Triple negative: yes versus no | 1.94 (1.46–2.32) | <0.001 | 1.16 (0.69–1.93) | 0.577 |
Trastuzumab | ||||
Yes versus no | 0.81 (0.65–1.00) | 0.052 | 0.76 (0.47–1.23) | 0.263 |
Endocrine therapy | ||||
Yes versus no | 0.57 (0.47–0.69) | <0.001 | 0.55 (0.36–0.85) | 0.007 |
Radiation therapy | ||||
Yes versus no | 1.09 (0.78–1.52) | 0.626 | 0.74 (0.45–1.23) | 0.251 |
HR hazard ratio, ypN0 axillary pathologic complete response, ypNitc/mi axillary residual isolated tumor cells or micrometastases, ypN1-3 axillary residual macrometastases, ypT-stage pathologic tumor stage after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, ER estrogen, PR progesterone, Her2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
aExcluded from multivariable analysis due to collinearity with endocrine therapy
bExcluded from multivariable analysis due to collinearity with trastuzumab