Table 3.

Wine frequency and intensity demand equation estimates, males

	All drinkers		Binge drinkers
	Frequency	Intensity	Frequency	Intensity
Linear time trend	−0.02***	−0.01***	0.04**	−0.01
	(0.01)	(0.00)	(0.02)	(0.01)
Alcohol duty change 08	−0.01	0.02*	0.03	0.01
	(0.02)	(0.01)	(0.06)	(0.02)
INCOME1 (reference)
INCOME2	0.05	0.00	−0.27**	−0.03
	(0.05)	(0.03)	(0.14)	(0.07)
INCOME3	0.29***	0.03	−0.52**	−0.02
	(0.06)	(0.03)	(0.23)	(0.12)
INCOME4	0.52***	0.04	−0.83**	−0.01
	(0.08)	(0.05)	(0.39)	(0.20)
INCOME5	0.82***	0.05	−0.96*	0.01
	(0.11)	(0.06)	(0.51)	(0.26)
INCOME6	1.06***	0.05	−0.81	0.02
	(0.12)	(0.07)	(0.52)	(0.27)
COMPULSORY SCHOOL (reference)
COLLEGE	0.65***	−0.00	−0.14	0.08
	(0.06)	(0.04)	(0.21)	(0.11)
UNIVERSITY	0.96***	−0.04	1.37***	0.11
	(0.05)	(0.03)	(0.28)	(0.14)
LNAGE	0.14***	−0.14***	0.74***	−0.12
	(0.02)	(0.01)	(0.26)	(0.14)
EMP (reference)
INACTIVE	0.08*	0.08***	−0.10	0.08**
	(0.04)	(0.02)	(0.09)	(0.04)
UNEMP	0.42***	−0.04	−0.06	−0.03
	(0.06)	(0.03)	(0.11)	(0.05)
STUDENT	0.28***	−0.07***	0.18***	−0.08***
	(0.03)	(0.02)	(0.03)	(0.01)
COHABIT	−0.11***	0.03	0.30*	0.01
	(0.03)	(0.02)	(0.16)	(0.08)
IMR	1.04***	−0.07	−2.08**	0.14
	(0.17)	(0.10)	(0.92)	(0.48)
CONSTANT	−3.98***	1.58***	−0.95**	0.94***
	(0.41)	(0.24)	(0.42)	(0.21)
Participation observations	59,251	59,251	59,251	59,251
Freq/intens observations	31,925	31,925	14,414	14,414
Proportion drink/binge	54 %	54 %	24 %	24 %

Results are conditional on wine drinking participation. Reference categories are income <10,000 sek, compulsory schooling, employed, and living alone. Alcohol duty change is a dummy set to one after January 1st 2008 when there was a change in beer and wine excise duties. Month dummies to capture resampling effects and seasonality and regional dummies are included in all models (reference categories: Stockholm and January). Testing the null of no effect: *** p < 0.01; ** p < 0.05; * p < 0.1