Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 11;8:525. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00525

Table 4.

Mean AST error percentages as a function of mood.

Stressed Neutral Positive Sad
High caloric food
     Approach 13.52 (8.21) 14.19 (7.92) 13.86 (8.07) 14.16 (5.35)
     Avoid 28.33 (14.21) 23.81 (9.85) 28.28 (11.69) 23.11 (14.13)
Low caloric food
     Approach 14.95 (8.33) 13.95 (9.45) 12.19 (9.55) 12.68 (9.74)
     Avoid 34.38 (14.68) 30.19 (13.67) 28.57 (14.26) 27.58 (14.39)
Neutral stimuli
     Approach 16.62 (7.61) 19.14 (10.99) 17.47 (8.15) 15.16 (10.46)
     Avoid 29.48 (13.07) 27.48 (13.39) 23.71 (8.17) 23.42 (14.99)
AST Bias scores HC 3.10 (10.88) 4.95 (9.94) 3.62 (8.99) 1.00 (7.64)
AST Bias scores LC 1.67 (10.75) 5.19 (11.58) 5.29 (11.14) 2.47 (8.44)

Means of the AST errors and bias scores, with SD in parenthesis. Approach biases were calculated by first subtracting amount of errors of approach trials from amount of errors of avoidance trials for each stimulus type separately (high caloric food, low caloric food, neutral pictures) and subsequently, subtracting the approach bias of neutral pictures from the approach bias of both high caloric and low caloric food. AST, Affective Simon Task manikin version; HC, high caloric; LC, low caloric.