Table 2. Utility of EUS as compared with MIS staging in determination of N stage.
Studies | Number of patients | Histology | EUSa | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accuracy (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | |||
Luketich et al., 1997 (18) | 26 | 24 (92%) AC; 2 (8%) SCC | 65 | 65 | 66 |
Luketich et al., 2000 (13) | 53 | 46 (87%) AC; 7 (13%) SCC | 62 | 62.5 | 60 |
Kaushik et al., 2007 (19) | 47 | 45 (96%) AC; 2 (4%) SCC | 90/72b | -- | -- |
AC, adenocarcinoma; EUS, endoscopic ultrasound; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma. a, Nodal status as determined by laparoscopy and/ or thoracoscopy was used to assess accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of EUS; b, 90% accuracy for nodal staging when used for FNA; 72% overall staging accuracy.