Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 3.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Biol. 2017 Mar 16;27(7):1048–1054. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.036

Table 1. Immaturity at birth alters amplitudes of ERP touch responses.

Differences in ERP amplitudes between full-term and preterm infants: Comparison of responses to touch between term and preterm infants in four time windows of significance.

Tactile processing mean amplitude in full-term and preterm infants in identified time intervals post-stimulus (μV; 95% confidence interval indicated)
Stimulus Time (ms) Full-term Preterm p
Touch 171–240 0.33 (−0.09,1.16) −0.24 (−0.60,0.26) <0.001*
Touch 241–340 0.75 (0.19,1.37) −0.10 (−0.53,0.56) <0.001*
Touch 341–400 0.27 (−0.40,1.14) −0.17 (−0.73,0.70) 0.051*
Touch 401–500 0.07 (−0.71,0.92) −0.18 (−0.93,0.62) 0.212

Sham 171–240 0.32 (−0.35,0.73) 0.12 (−0.24,0.26) 0.291
Sham 241–340 0.14 (−0.31,0.81) 0.05 (−.37,0.41) 0.319
Sham 341–400 0.09 (−0.46,0.66) −0.11 (−0.56,0.51) 0.603
Sham 401–500 0.24 (−0.61,1.05) −0.07 (−0.72,0.52) 0.212
*

Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. All results expressed as median amplitude (interquartile range).

**

Increase in microvolts ERP response per 1week unit in the predictor