Table 2. Improved tactile processing amplitude is associated with increasing gestational age at birth in preterm infants.
Associations between ERP amplitudes to touch, gestational age at birth (GA) and postnatal days (PND)
Univariable models | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Predictor | Stimulus | Slope** | Confidence Interval | p |
GA | Touch | 0.08 | (0.05, 0.12) | <0.001* |
PND | Touch | −0.02 | (0.07, 0.04) | 0.524 |
GA | Sham | 0.01 | (−0.02, 0.05) | 0.530 [−0.684] |
PND | Sham | 0.01 | (0.04, 0.06) | 0.684 |
| ||||
Multivariable model for tactile stimulus | ||||
Value | Standard Error | t-value | p | |
| ||||
Intercept | −3.19 | 1.31 | −2.43 | 0.02 |
GA | 0.10 | 0.03 | 2.85 | 0.01 |
PND | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.54 | 0.59 |
Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. All results expressed as median amplitude (interquartile range).
Increase in microvolts ERP response per 1week unit in the predictor
Table 2 is related to Figure S1