. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 11.

Published in final edited form as: Sci Transl Med. 2016 Mar 16;8(330):330re1. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad5651

Table 2. Mean scores for functional assessment measures for anodal tDCS and sham treatment groups.

	Anodal tDCS Mean (SD)	Sham Mean (SD)
Baseline UEFM	38.90 (15.89)	36.42 (17.38)
Day 10 UEFM	50.36 (11.16)	45.53 (14.62)
1 Week UEFM	48.91 (11.90)	45.92 (15.52)
1 Month UEFM	49.73 (12.67)	46.46 (14.35)
3 Month UEFM	48.18 (14.35)	43.15 (16.29)

Baseline ARAT	20.27 (17.37)	26.27 (20.17)
Day 10 ARAT	29.91 (21.54)	32.54 (21.54)
1 Week ARAT	30.45 (20.67)	33.08 (21.84)
1 Month ARAT	30.27 (21.91)	31.92 (20.64)
3 Month ARAT	30.45 (20.92)	31.31 (21.84)

Baseline WMFT	37.91 (20.21)	39.65 (25.39)
Day 10 WMFT	47.18 (17.46)	48.00 (23.42)
1 Week WMFT	49.45 (20.30)	48.92 (24.44)
1 Month WMFT	49.18 (19.08)	46.54 (23.12)
3 Month WMFT	48.36 (18.19)	43.09 (23.78)

In all assessments, higher scores indicate better performance. The UEFM ranges from 0-66, ARAT ranges from 0-57, and WMFT ranges from 0-75. Results are shown as mean ± SD.