Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 3;10:1955–1967. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S126075

Table S1.

Characteristics of cohort studies included in meta-analyses

Study, country EGFR-TKIs; n (%) as first line Population; clinical stage Pathological type (n) Specimen; method BIM deletion rate, n (%) ORR, n (%) Median PFS (months, with vs without BIM deletion) Median OS (months, with vs without BIM deletion) Adjusted covariates for hazard ratio
Ng et al,1 Singapore, Japan Gefitinib or erlotinib; 93 (66.0) Patients with EGFR- NSCLC; III/IV/recurrent AC (128); BAC (4); others (9); total (141) Peripheral blood or biopsy slides and blocks; DNA polymorphism 26 (18.4) NR 6.6 vs 11.9 NR Age, gender, histology, smoking history, type of EGFR mutation by exon and specific mutation, stage, first- or second-line TKI therapy, race, country, TKI type and ECOG status
Lee et al,2 Korea Gefitinib or erlotinib; 67 (34.0) Patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR- activating mutations; IIIB/IV/postoperative relapse AC (191); ASC (1); NSCLC, NOS (5); total (197) Tumor tissue; DNA polymorphism 21 (10.9) 154 (77.7) 11.9 vs 11.3 NR NR
Zheng et al,3 People’s Republic of China Gefitinib or erlotinib; 0 Patients with advanced NSCLC; IIIB/IV AC (97); others (26); total (123) Peripheral blood; DNA polymorphism 21 (17.1) 36 (29.3) 3.5 vs 6.0 NR Age, gender, histology, smoking history, stage, line of TKI therapy, TKI type and performance status
Costa et al,4 European Erlotinib; 50 (100) Patients with advanced EGFR-mutation- positive NSCLC; IIIB (malignant effusion)/IV/unknown (n=1) AC (47); others (3); total (50) Tumor tissue; mRNA expression Low (<1.83) or intermediate (1.83–2.96) in 53 (64.0) and high (≥2.96) in 30 (36.1) 28 (56.0) 7.2 vs 12.9 20.8 vs 24.5 Potential risk factors as covariates
Zhong et al,5 People’s Republic of China Gefitinib or erlotinib; overall 35.5% Patients with advanced EGFR-mutation-positive NSCLC; overall – IIIa (4.5); IIIb (7.6); IV (78.7) AC (159) Patient blood samples; DNA polymorphism Overall, 15.5% Overall, 24.5% 7.3 vs 9.5 21.9 vs 21.9 (overall) NR
Isobe et al,6 Japan Gefitinib or erlotinib; 70 (100) Patients with EGFR-mutation-positive NSCLC; IV/recurrent AC (65); SCC (7); total (72) Peripheral blood; DNA polymorphism 18.6 64.30 7.5 vs 17.6 38.9 vs 45.1 Sex, bone metastasis and smoking history
Zhao et al,7 People’s Republic of China Gefitinib or erlotinib; 69 (41.6) Patients with activating EGFR mutations – NSCLC; IIIB/IV AC (140); SCC (8); ASC (9); others (9); total (166) Tumor tissue; DNA polymorphism 9.6 62.0 4.7 vs 11.0 NR Age, gender and exon 19 deletion vs L858R
Lee et al,8 People’s Republic of China Gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib; overall 153 (75) Patients with activating EGFR mutations – NSCLC; IIIB/IV Overall: AC (189); non-AC (12); unspecified (3) Peripheral blood; DNA polymorphism 20.0 51.0 7.4 vs 9.4 18.3 vs 24.9 Age, gender, EGFR mutation and non-AC
Lee et al,9 Korea Gefitinib or erlotinib; 68 (33) Patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received EGFR-TKIs; IIIB/IV/postoperative relapse AC (203); SCC (2); total (205) Peripheral blood; DNA polymorphism 15.6 85.0 11.9 vs 10.9 31.2 vs 30.3 Age, gender, smoking history, performance status, pathology, stage, number of metastases, type of EGFR mutation, EGFR-TKIs type, and line of EGFR-TKIs
Present study, People’s Republic of China Gefitinib or erlotinib; 54 (38.6) Patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received EGFR-TKIs; IIIB/IV AC (128); others (12); total (140) Peripheral blood; DNA polymorphism 26.4 56.4 20.6 vs 17.0 34.2 vs 33.0 None; prespecified subgroup analyses done

Abbreviations: AC, adenocarcinoma; ASC, adenosquamous carcinoma; BAC, bronchioalveolar carcinoma; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; NOS, not otherwise specified; NR, not reported; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; TKIs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors.