Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 12;8:386. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00386

Table 2.

Frequencies of six CTLA-4 gene variants in 173 metastatic melanoma patients and in healthy control subjects.

n (%)
n (frequency)
Genotypes Melanoma patients (n = 173) Controls (n = 100) P Alleles Melanoma patients (2n = 346) Controls (2n = 200) P*
−1661A>G −1661A>G
A/A 102 (59.0) 58 (58.0) 0.868 A 266 (0.77) 154 (0.77) 1.000
A/G 62 (35.8) 38 (38.0) G 80 (0.23) 46 (0.23)
G/G 9 (5.2) 4 (4.0)
HWE P = 0.915 P = 0.466
−1577G>A −1577G>A
G/G 49 (28.3) 26 (26.0) 0.807 G 186 (0.54) 102 (0.51) 0.535
G/A 88 (50.9) 50 (50.0) A 160 (0.46) 98 (0.49)
A/A 36 (20.8) 24 (24.0)
HWE P = 0.761 P = 0.997
−658C>T −658C>T
C/C 139 (80.3) 76 (76.0) 0.669 C 310 (0.89) 175 (0.87) 0.482
C/T 32 (18.5) 23 (23.0) T 36 (0.11) 25 (0.13)
T/T 2 (1.2) 1 (1.0)
HWE P = 0.917 P = 0.607
−319C>T −319C>T
C/C 139 (80.3) 81 (81.0) 0.517 C 311 (0.90) 179 (0.89) 0.884
C/T 33 (19.1) 17 (17.0) T 35 (0.10) 21 (0.11)
T/T 1 (0.6) 2 (2.0)
HWE P = 0.519 P = 0.339
+49A>G +49A>G
A/A 96 (55.5) 55 (55.0) 0.780 A 255 (0.74) 149 (0.75) 0.919
A/G 63 (36.4) 39 (39.0) G 91 (0.26) 51 (0.25)
G/G 14 (8.1) 6 (6.0)
HWE P = 0.425 P = 0.791
CT60G>A CT60G>A
G/G 42 (24.3) 24 (24.0) 0.877 G 173 (0.50) 97 (0.48) 0.790
G/A 89 (51.4) 49 (49.0) A 173 (0.50) 103 (0.52)
A/A 42 (24.3) 27 (27.0)
HWE P = 0.748 P = 0.848

Genotyping of −1661A>G, −1577A>G, −658C>T, and CT60G>A was performed by the pyrosequencing (PSQ) method and genotyping of −319C>T and +49A>G was performed by T-ARMS PCR and confirmed by PSQ as described in the Section “Materials and Methods”. Comparison of CTLA-4 genotypic and allelic frequencies between melanoma patients and control subjects was estimated using the Pearson’s χ2 test (P-value) and the Fisher’s test (*P-value), respectively. Statistical significance: P < 0.05. HWE, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium tested by χ2 test (P < 0.05 indicates a lack of HWE).