Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 3;131(3):797–801. doi: 10.1007/s00414-016-1468-3

Table 1.

Summary data for each of the grades of periodontal ligament visibility (PLV). f = female, m = male UK Caucasian data

n-tds x¯ -tds sd-tds min-tds 25th%ile 50th%ile 75th%ile max-tds 18-year threshold p < 18 p > 18
Females
 PLV-Af 8 19.57 1.83 16.33 18.23 20.28 20.60 22.06 14.20 % 0.142 0.858
 PLV-Bf 202 21.25 2.16 16.17 19.80 21.21 22.61 25.83 5.90 % 0.059 0.941
 PLV-Cf 277 22.96 1.95 18.08 21.43 23.36 24.47 25.95 0.00 % 0.000 1.000
 PLV-Df 54 23.86 1.79 18.58 22.66 24.33 25.39 25.99 0.00 % 0.000 1.000
Males
 PLV-Am 12 20.32 1.61 17.69 19.58 20.27 21.48 22.80 9.00 % 0.090 0.910
 PLV-Bm 151 21.17 2.13 17.62 19.48 20.85 22.68 25.43 2.60 % 0.026 0.974
 PLV-Cm 308 22.49 2.11 18.10 20.86 22.63 24.22 25.43 0.00 % 0.000 1.000
 PLV-Dm 87 23.37 1.85 18.67 22.29 23.61 24.94 25.93 0.00 % 0.000 1.000

n-tds indicates the tooth development stages for the subgroup (PLV-A etc.) as distinct from N which refers to the full sample of 1000 females and 1000 males. The numbers in italics indicate a probability of being under or over 18-years as 0.000 [0%] and 1.000 [100% certainty]