Table 2.

Summary of ANOVA results for age and stance effects on synchronization likelihood of the electrode pairs in the fronto-sensorimotor area (SL_FSM).

Threshold	ANOVA statistics	Post-hoc analysis (stance effect)
0.1	Stance: F(1, 22) = 9.24, p = 0.006; Age: F(1, 22) = 4.69, p = 0.041; Stance × Age: F(1, 22) = 0.96, p = 0.338	–
0.2	Stance: F(1, 22) = 14.19, p = 0.001; Age: F(1, 22) = 4.09, p = 0.056; Stance × Age: F(1, 22) = 0.14, p = 0.709	–
0.3	Stance: F(1, 22) = 16.73, p < 0.001; Age: F(1, 22) = 4.34, p = 0.049; Stance × Age: F(1, 22) = 0.40, p = 0.532	–
0.4	Stance: F(1, 22) = 17.92, p < 0.001; Age: F(1, 22) = 5.49, p = 0.029; Stance × Age: F(1, 22) = 0.00, p = 0.974	–
0.5	Stance: F(1, 22) = 20.18, p < 0.001; Age: F(1, 22) = 5.31, p = 0.031; Stance × Age: F(1, 22) = 0.13, p = 0.719	–
0.6	Stance: F(1, 22) = 21.57, p < 0.001; Age: F(1, 22) = 5.17, p = 0.033; Stance × Age: F(1, 22) = 0.00, p = 0.974	–
0.7	Stance: F(1, 22) = 24.15, p < 0.001; Age: F(1, 22) = 4.92, p = 0.037; Stance × Age: F(1, 22) = 0.05, p = 0.823	–
0.8	Stance: F(1, 22) = 28.09, p < 0.001; Age: F(1, 22) = 5.49, p = 0.029; Stance × Age: F(1, 22) = 0.08, p = 0.778	–
0.9	Stance: F(1, 22) = 29.23, p < 0.001; Age: F(1, 22) = 5.03, p = 0.035; Stance × Age: F(1, 22) = 0.06, p = 0.813	–

−, post-hoc analysis should not be processed due to non-significant interaction effect.