Table 3.

Summary of ANOVA results for age and stance effects on synchronization likelihood of the electrode pairs in the parietal-occipital area (SL_PO).

Threshold	ANOVA statistics	Post-hoc analysis (stance effect)
0.1	Stance: F(1, 22) = 3.40, p = 0.079; Age: F(1, 22) = 5.70, p = 0.026; Stance × Age: F(1, 22) = 2.16, p = 0.156	–
0.2	Stance: F(1, 22) = 4.61, p = 0.043; Age: F(1, 22) = 6.07, p = 0.022; Stance × Age: F(1, 22) = 4.38, p = 0.048	Young: F(1, 22) = 8.99, p = 0.007
		Older: F(1, 22) = 0.00, p = 0.971
0.3	Stance: F(1, 22) = 3.70, p = 0.068; Age: F(1, 22) = 2.09, p = 0.162; Stance × Age: F(1, 22) = 6.38, p = 0.019	Young: F(1, 22) = 9.89, p = 0.005
		Older: F(1, 22) = 0.18, p = 0.674
0.4	Stance: F(1, 22) = 2.88, p = 0.104; Age: F(1, 22) = 5.36, p = 0.030; Stance × Age: F(1, 22) = 5.11, p = 0.034	Young: F(1, 22) = 7.83, p = 0.010
		Older: F(1, 22) = 0.16, p = 0.695
0.5	Stance: F(1, 22) = 0.56, p = 0.463; Age: F(1, 22) = 6.58, p = 0.018; Stance × Age: F(1, 22) = 2.91, p = 0.102	–
0.6	Stance: F(1, 22) = 0.17, p = 0.683; Age: F(1, 22) = 6.38, p = 0.019; Stance × Age: F(1, 22) = 2.28, p = 0.145	–
0.7	Stance: F(1, 22) = 1.38, p = 0.253; Age: F(1, 22) = 4.43, p = 0.047; Stance × Age: F(1, 22) = 3.19, p = 0.088	–
0.8	Stance: F(1, 22) = 2.72, p = 0.113; Age: F(1, 22) = 3.09, p = 0.093; Stance × Age: F(1, 22) = 4.35, p = 0.049	Young: F(1, 22) = 0.10, p = 0.760
		Older: F(1, 22) = 6.98, p = 0.015
0.9	Stance: F(1, 22) = 3.49, p = 0.075; Age: F(1, 22) = 2.42, p = 0.134; Stance × Age: F(1, 22) = 4.55, p = 0.044	Young: F(1, 22) = 0.04, p = 0.853
		Older: F(1, 22) = 8.07, p = 0.009

−, post-hoc analysis should not be processed due to non-significant interaction effect.