Skip to main content
. 2005 Jan;49(1):302–308. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.1.302-308.2005

TABLE 5.

R2484 versus cefepime combined with various antimicrobials at various dosing intervals

Antimicrobial agent (regimen) Activities of drug against MRSA R 2484 in combination witha:
Cefepime (2 g q12h)
Cefepime (2 g q8h)
Cefepime (continuous infusion)
Δ48-h log10 CFU/ml Activities Δ48-h log10 CFU/ml Activities Δ48-h log10 CFU/ml Activities
Gentamicin (5.0 mg/kg q24h) −3.85* ENC −2.05 ENC −1.46** IMP
Gentamicin (2.0 mg/kg q12h) 0.23 IND −0.93 IND −0.93 IND
Gentamicin (1.0 mg/kg q12h) −4.32*** ENC −2.05 ENC −1.46** IMP
Tobramycin (5.0 mg/kg q24h) −2.81** ENC −2.05 ENC −0.44 IND
Tobramycin (2.0 mg/kg q12h) −3.03*** ENC −2.05 ENC −1.46** IMP
Tobramycin (1.0 mg/kg q12h) −3.63*** ENC −2.05 ENC −1.46** IMP
Arbekacin −2.9** ENC −1.24 IMP −1.46** IMP
Daptomycin 0.9 IND 0.69 IND 0 IND
Linezolid −1.32 IMP −0.43 IND −0.24 IND
Tigecycline 2.06 ANG −0.28 IND −0.66 IND
a

Change in 48-h log10 CFU of R2484/ml with cefepime (2 g q12h, 2 g q8h, and continuous infusion) plus gentamicin (1.0 or 2.0 mg/kg q12h or 5.0 mg/kg q24h), tobramycin (1.0 or 2.0 mg/kg q12h or 5.0 mg/kg q24h), arbekacin, daptomycin, linezolid, or tigecycline compared to results with the most potent agent alone. ENC, enhancement; IMP, improvement; ANG, antagonistic; IND, indifferent. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001.