Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 12;17:268. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2233-0

Table 2.

Health facility, Pharmacy, and PMV family planning providers’ prevalence of restriction of clients’ access to contraceptive methods by restriction and method, Nigeria 2010

Health facility providers Pharmacists PMV Operators
Minimum age n % n % n %
 Male condom 692 73.1 410 76.3 474 70.7
 Pill 906 86.9** 318 81.8 313 79.9
 EC 395 70.1*** 292 82.9 183 75.4
 Injectable 1071 88.5* 289 84.1 na na
 IUD 560 93.2 na na na na
Minimum parity
 Male condom 692 3.0* 410 2.9 474 5.7
 Pill 906 38.3*** 318 28.9 313 43.5
 EC 395 12.7* 292 12.3 183 20.2
 Injectable 1071 64.7*** 289 21.8 na na
 IUD 560 53.4 na na na na
Marital status
 Male condom 692 10.4 410 9.5 474 7.2
 Pill 906 51.3*** 318 41.5 313 57.5
 EC 395 16.7** 292 26.4 183 23.5
 Injectable 1071 73.5*** 289 45.3 na na
 IUD 560 67.3 na na na na
Overall bias score
 Male condom 692 0.9 410 0.9 474 0.8
 Pill 906 1.8*** 318 1.5 313 1.8
 EC 395 1.0*** 292 1.2 183 1.2
 Injectable 1071 2.3*** 289 1.5 na na
 IUD 560 2.1 na na na na
 Totala 3.7 3.6 3.8

na Not applicable

*p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001; Chi Square, Anova, and t-tests of the association between bias and provider type

anot including injectable or IUD