Table 3.

Health facility family planning providers’ prevalence of restriction of clients’ access to contraceptive methods among Nurses/Midwives and CHEWs by restriction, method, and experience of in-service family planning training experience, Nigeria 2010

	Nurse/Midwife				CHEW
	Any In-service FP Training		No In-service FP Training		Any In-service FP Training		No In-service FP Training
Minimum age	n	%	n	%	n	%	n	%
Male condom	245	80.0	176	75.6	122	65.6	102	63.7
Pill	276	91.3*	246	85.8	145	89.7**	181	77.9
EC	156	72.4	104	64.4	44	77.3	48	70.8
Injectable	307	91.2*	320	86.3	155	92.9*	222	84.2
IUD	223	92.8	126	96.0	96	92.7	67	91.0
Minimum parity
Male condom	245	3.7	176	3.4	122	1.6	102	2.9
Pill	276	33.3	246	39.4	145	29.7***	181	50.8
EC	156	10.3	104	13.5	44	13.6	48	20.8
Injectable	307	57.3**	320	67.5	155	65.2	222	72.5
IUD	223	48.4	126	58.7	96	51.0	67	64.2
Marital status
Male condom	245	7.8	176	10.2	122	10.7	102	15.7
Pill	276	40.6***	246	56.5	145	39.3***	181	71.8
EC	156	14.1	104	16.4	44	15.9	48	22.9
Injecable	307	65.2***	320	78.1	155	67.7***	222	85.1
IUD	223	59.2***	126	81.0	96	61.5**	67	80.6
Bias score
Male condom	245	0.9	176	0.9	122	0.8	102	0.8
Pill	276	1.7*	246	1.8	145	1.6***	181	2.0
EC	156	1.0	104	0.9	44	1.1	48	1.1
Injectable	307	2.1*	320	2.3	155	2.3	222	2.4
IUD	223	2.0***	126	2.4	96	2.1*	67	2.4
Total		7.7		8.3		7.9		8.7

*p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001; Chi Square, Fisher’s Exact, and Anova tests of the association between bias and experience of training