Table 4.

Pharmacy and PMV providers’ prevalence of restriction of clients’ access to contraceptive methods by restriction, method, and family planning training experience, Nigeria 2010

	Pharmacist				PMV
	Any FP Training		No FP Training		Any FP Training		No FP Training
Minimum age	n	%	n	%	n	%	n	%
Male condom	172	79.7	238	74.0	213	75.6*	261	66.7
Pill	148	89.2***	170	75.3	153	85.0*	160	75.0
EC	127	89.8**	165	77.6	89	82.0*	94	69.2
Injectable	130	88.5	159	80.5	na	na	na	na
Minimum parity
Male condom	172	2.9	238	2.9	213	7.5	261	4.2
Pill	148	29.1	170	28.8	153	42.5	160	44.4
EC	127	11.8	165	12.7	89	25.8	94	14.9
Injectable	130	22.3	159	21.4	na	na	na	na
Marital status
Male condom	172	7.6	238	10.9	213	6.6	261	7.7
Pill	148	43.9	170	39.4	153	61.4	160	53.8
EC	127	24.4	165	27.9	89	31.5*	94	16.0
Injectable	130	41.5	159	48.4	na	na	na	na
Bias score
Male condom	172	0.9	238	0.9	213	0.9*	261	0.8
Pill	148	1.6	170	1.4	153	1.9	160	1.7
EC	127	1.3	165	1.2	89	1.4**	94	1.0
Injectable	130	1.5	159	1.5	na	na	na	na
Totala		3.8		3.5		4.2		3.5

na Provider doesn’t have jurisdiction to provide method

*p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001; Chi Square, Fisher’s Exact, and t-tests of the association between bias and any family planning training experience

^anot including injectable