Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 20;114(14):3590–3595. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620714114

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Geometry-driven metamaterial properties of a kirigami lantern-like module. (A) The design pattern of one module (Left) involves cutting a thin sheet along the thick black lines, then folding along the mountain (dashed) and valley (solid) creases. Edges BCD and BCD are bonded to create crease-like hinges in each of the four symmetric quadrants. Similarly, FE is bonded to FE, along with the symmetric edges in the module’s upper half. The plane angle parameters α and γ and lengths m, n, q determine the 3D structure shown in the 1/4 (Middle) and full (Right) unit module. The dihedral angle θ is chosen to quantify the module’s configuration. Parameters ϕ and β are useful for the mathematical description of the geometry (Materials and Methods). (B) The module takes various forms determined by the configuration angle θ=0°,90°,180°,270°, and 360°. Poisson ratios (C) νZY and (D) νZX as functions of folding configuration for α=60° and γ=20°,30°,40°, and 50°. Poisson ratios (E) νZY and (F) νZX as functions of folding configuration for γ=40° and α=50°,89°,110°, and 140°. Calculations in CF use m/q=n/q=1.5. (G) The normalized elastic energy U as a function of γ and θ for parameter values α=100°,m/q=n/q=1, k2/k1=1.5, and θ0=10°. Arrow indicates the module undergoes a bistable transition between two energetic minima during folding. (H) The module’s configuration for the two mechanically stable states in G. Reading left to right in B and H corresponds to compression along z^, whereas right to left corresponds to tension along z^.