Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 20;114(14):3590–3595. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620714114

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Assembly of kirigami modules into voxelized 3D mechanical metamaterials. (A) Tessellating voxels in the x^y^-plane leads to metamaterials that are (B) stackable along the z^-axis. These structures have mechanical properties independent of their ability to tessellate 3D space. Plots of the Poisson ratios (C) νZX and (D) νZY as a function of deformation angle θ show a wide range of allowable behaviors for the same 4×7×4 cuboid bulk structure in B, but with variable parameters for α and γ. For the plots shown here, we chose γ=arcsin[(9/10)sin(α)] to obtain a wide variety of behavior in νZX. D, Inset shows the error ϵ3D between target 3D structure and voxelized 3D structure as a function of the product of scaling factors ξx,ξy, and ξz (Materials and Methods). Larger values of ξ lead to larger voxels with a coarser approximation of the target structure, whereas lower values of ξ have smaller voxels and a more fine approximation. (E) The top row shows five target 3D structures representing a sphere, three triply-periodic minimal surfaces, and a digitized micro-CT scan of a mouse femur bone. The second and third rows are renderings of the different voxelized 3D metamaterials with folding configurations given by θ=90°,180°, and 270°. Increasing θ corresponds to compression along z^, whereas decreasing θ corresponds to tension along z^. Although all structures have identical compressive properties (α=60°,γ=51°, and m/q=n/q=1), the scaling factor triplets ξx,ξy,ξz are 0.37,0.21,0.26 for the sphere and triply-periodic minimal surfaces, whereas the micro-CT scan has ξx,ξy,ξz=8,9,5×103. These large-scale metamaterials highlight the complex topology that can be achieved independent from the prescribed mechanical properties using the NpNc>0 design strategy.