Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 20;114(14):E2937–E2946. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620572114

Table S2.

Attenuation factors arising from rod waveguide properties, alignment, and other morphological features of the rod

Factor Fold attenuation Description Comments and source
i 1.3 Fraction of 860-nm power in the core of the mouse rod waveguide (12, 15)
ii ∼2 Variation across the OCT B-scan field Beam axis vs. photoreceptor waveguide axis
iii ∼2 Variation across experiments in optimal alignment of mouse System optical axis vs. mouse eye optical axis
iv 5–6 Apodization by optical system pupil Assuming rod N.A. = 0.25
v 2–5 Ultrastructure of the IS/OS (OS base): inhomogeneity and surface tilt Fig. 5; Δz ≤ 0.4 μm vs. λ = 0.86 nm
vi ∼2 Axial distribution of the IS/OS (Fig. S1) vs. the axial psf
All ∼100−300 Total attenuation