Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb;187(2):418–430. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.10.022

Table 4.

Biochemical and Molecular Evaluation of Oxidative Stress and Liver Inflammation and Necrosis in Wt, Gsta4−/−, Ppara−/−, and Ppara−/−/Gsta4−/− dKO Mice Receiving a Chow or 70% HF Diet

Group GSSG/GSH mRNA expression (fold change)
Cyp2e1 Nox2 Nox4
Wt chow 0.80 ± 0.10 1.00 ± 0.12 1.00 ± 0.06 1.00 ± 0.25
Wt 70% HF 0.89 ± 0.07 1.41 ± 0.13 1.43 ± 0.09 0.78 ± 0.09
Gsta4−/− chow 0.85 ± 0.17 1.24 ± 0.06 1.13 ± 0.01 1.49 ± 0.34
Gsta4−/− 70% HF 0.83 ± 0.06 1.30 ± 0.09 1.34 ± 0.15 0.80 ± 0.08
Ppara−/− chow 0.82 ± 0.10 0.86 ± 0.06 1.26 ± 0.04 1.24 ± 0.30
Ppara−/− 70% HF 1.79 ± 0.34∗† 1.34 ± 0.09 3.68 ± 0.43∗† 6.57 ± 0.49∗†
dKO chow 0.84 ± 0.11 0.97 ± 0.03 1.03 ± 0.16 0.78 ± 0.18
dKO 70% HF 3.81 ± 0.79∗‡ 1.65 ± 0.07∗† 3.65 ± 0.54∗† 5.43 ± 0.36∗†
P value
 Genotype <0.001 0.081 <0.001 <0.001
 Diet <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Interaction <0.001 0.006 <0.001 <0.001

Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Hepatic GSSG/GSH ratio was determined as stated in Materials and Methods. Gene expression was assessed by real-time RT-PCR using 2−ΔΔCT method, as described in Materials and Methods. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way analysis of variance, followed by Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc analysis. n = 6 animals per wild-type group; n = 8 animals per knockout group.

P < 0.05 for chow versus 70% HF diet (within each genotype).

P < 0.05 (between genotypes for 70% HF diet).

P < 0.01 (between genotypes for 70% HF diet).

dKO, double knockout; GSH, reduced glutathione; GSSG, oxidized glutathione; HF, high fat; Nox, NADPH oxidase; Wt, wild type.