Table 4. Summary of methods for whole genome bisulphite sequencing library preparation.
TruSeq DNA methylation | SPLAT | Accel-NGS Methyl-Seq | NEBNextUltra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Input DNA quantity | 50–100 ng | ≤100 ng | ≤100 ng | ∼1000 ng |
Number of PCR cycles | 9 | 4 (100 ng input) | 4 (100 ng input) | 6 |
Amount of PCR duplicates | High | Low | Low | Low |
Genome coverage | GC biased | Relatively uniform | Relatively uniform | AT biased |
Advantages | Excellent coverage of CpG dense regions | High total CpG site coverage | High total CpG site coverage | _ |
Methylation highly concordant with other methods | Methylation highly concordant with other methods | Methylation highly concordant with other methods | ||
Very low library prep cost | ||||
Disadvantages | High proportion of data removed in pre-processing steps | Coverage in CpG dense regions is lower than the average coverage | Coverage in CpG dense regions is lower than the average coverage | Overall low coverage of CpG sites, particularly in CpG dense regions |
Sequence tag removal is required |