Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 29;45(6):e36. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1110

Table 4. Summary of methods for whole genome bisulphite sequencing library preparation.

TruSeq DNA methylation SPLAT Accel-NGS Methyl-Seq NEBNextUltra
Input DNA quantity 50–100 ng ≤100 ng ≤100 ng ∼1000 ng
Number of PCR cycles 9 4 (100 ng input) 4 (100 ng input) 6
Amount of PCR duplicates High Low Low Low
Genome coverage GC biased Relatively uniform Relatively uniform AT biased
Advantages Excellent coverage of CpG dense regions High total CpG site coverage High total CpG site coverage _
Methylation highly concordant with other methods Methylation highly concordant with other methods Methylation highly concordant with other methods
Very low library prep cost
Disadvantages High proportion of data removed in pre-processing steps Coverage in CpG dense regions is lower than the average coverage Coverage in CpG dense regions is lower than the average coverage Overall low coverage of CpG sites, particularly in CpG dense regions
Sequence tag removal is required