Table 2.
Equation-level goodness-of-fit indices
Dependents | Fitted | Predicted | Residual | R 2 | mc | mc2 | Wald-χ 2 | df | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subject sex | 0.181 | 0.372 | 0.143 | 0.206 | 0.453 | 0.205 | – | – | – |
Family size | 1.342 | 0.129 | 1.213 | 0.095 | 0.309 | 0.095 | 424.09 | 1 | 0.0000 |
Zung depression score | 86.991 | 25.412 | 61.578 | 0.293 | 0.540 | 0.292 | 769.79 | 1 | 0.0000 |
Triglycerides | 0.675 | 0.123 | 0.551 | 0.183 | 0.428 | 0.183 | 1130.25 | 1 | 0.0000 |
Microalbuminuria | 0.195 | 0.001 | 0.195 | 0.005 | 0.071 | 0.005 | 84.85 | 1 | 0.0000 |
Pulse pressure | 132.074 | 40.188 | 91.936 | 0.304 | 0.551 | 0.304 | 511.55 | 1 | 0.0000 |
Fasting plasma glucose | 4.053 | 0.536 | 3.516 | 0.132 | 0.363 | 0.132 | 1937.60 | 1 | 0.0000 |
Main component | 0.037 | 0.034 | 0.003 | 0.926 | 0.962 | 0.926 | 1074.60 | 3 | 0.0000 |
Overall | 0.927 |
mc correlation between the dependent variable and its prediction, mc 2 the Bentler–Raykov squared multiple correlation coefficient. Stability analysis yields a stability index = 0: SEM satisfies stability condition
P value tested against random permutation