Table 1.
Subdivision | Connectivity | Peak amplitude (mV) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Synapse | Region | Layer | Found | Tested | Probability | Median [interquartile range] | n |
PC–PC | Ventral | Superficial | 2 | 746 | 0.3%a | 0.33 [0.19;0.46] | 2 |
Deep | 19 | 524 | 3.6%a | 0.32 [0.14;0.47] | 19 | ||
Dorsal | Superficial | 2 | 274 | 0.7%b | 0.22 [0.13;0.31]o | 2 | |
Deep | 14 | 330 | 4.2%b | 0.17 [0.1;0.25]p | 14 | ||
PC–FS | Ventral | Superficial | 23 | 124 | 18.5%g | 2.31 [0.24;6.36]l | 23 |
Deep | 10 | 60 | 16.7% | 0.57 [0.21;2.22] | 10 | ||
Dorsal | Superficial | 14 | 35 | 40.0%c,g | 1.4 [0.58;3.31]j,m,o | 14 | |
Deep | 12 | 80 | 15.0%c | 0.55 [0.22;0.705]j,p | 12 | ||
PC–NFS | Ventral | Superficial | 37 | 243 | 15.2%h | 0.47 [0.22;1.78]k,l | 37 |
Deep | 24 | 219 | 11.0% | 0.43 [0.135;1.1] | 24 | ||
Dorsal | Superficial | 27 | 104 | 26.0%d,h | 0.18 [0.13;0.23]k,m | 27 | |
Deep | 11 | 87 | 12.6%d | 0.36 [0.1;1.3] | 11 | ||
FS–PC | Ventral | Superficial | 32 | 124 | 25.8% | −0.33 [−0.77;−0.19] | 18 |
Deep | 11 | 60 | 18.3%i | −0.13 [−0.17;−0.09] | 2 | ||
Dorsal | Superficial | 7 | 35 | 20.0%e | −0.58 [−0.66;−0.52]n | 7 | |
Deep | 4 | 80 | 5.0%e,i | −0.42 [−0.51;−0.31] | 4 | ||
NFS–PC | Ventral | Superficial | 42 | 243 | 17.3%f | −0.2 [−0.68;−0.11] | 23 |
Deep | 22 | 219 | 10.0%f | −0.28 [−0.38;−0.09] | 15 | ||
Dorsal | Superficial | 19 | 104 | 18.3% | −0.19 [−0.33;−0.12]n | 19 | |
Deep | 7 | 87 | 8.0% | −0.18 [−0.28;−0.06] | 7 |
The connection probability, calculated by the number of detected synaptic connections divided by the number of tested possible connections, is shown for different synaptic types, in the dorsal and ventral regions, and for the superficial and deep layers. Given the nonparametric distribution of the peak amplitudes of postsynaptic potentials, their central tendency and dispersion are depicted using the median and the interquartile range that is the interval from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Superscripts indicate P values below 0.05 of statistical comparisons between subgroups. Same superscripts indicate the 2 compared values. Due to correction for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method, the given P values are only statistically significant at α = 0.05 if they are below 0.013 for excitatory connections or below 0.017 for inhibitory connections. Statistical differences in connection probability were assessed using the Fisher's exact test. P values of layer comparison: a 0.011, b 0.009, c 0.007, d 0.028, e 0.033, and f 0.03. Region comparison: g 0.012, h 0.023, and i 0.014. Note that the excitatory connection probability onto PC is significantly lower than onto IN in all subgroups. Comparisons for postsynaptic amplitude were assessed using Mann–Whitney U test. P values for layer comparison: j 0.011. Region comparison: k < 0.001. Comparison between synaptic groups: l 0.031, m < 0.001, n 0.001, o 0.017, and p 0.011. See Supplementary Tables 1–5 for further statistics. Except for PC–PC connection probability, none of the other nonsignificant comparisons can be declared as statistically equivalent.