Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 3;18(3):476–486. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.3.476

Table 4. Diagnostic Performance of Different Imaging Modalities for Coronary Artery Disease in Patients without Coronary Stent.

CCTA DE-CTP SPECT CCTA + DE-CTP CCTA + SPECT
Per-vascular territory analysis
 Sensitivity 100 (92–100)
(20/20)
100 (92–100)
(20/20)
70 (56–81)
(14/20)
100 (92–100)
(20/20)
70 (56–81)
(14/20)
 Specificity 84 (71–92)
(21/25)
88 (75–95)
(22/25)
96 (86–99)
(24/25)
96 (86–99)
(24/25)
100 (92–100)
(25/25)
 PPV 83 (70–92)
(20/24)
87 (74–94)
(20/23)
93 (82–98)
(14/15)
95 (85–99)
(20/21)
100 (92–100)
(14/14)
 NPV 100 (92–100)
(21/21)
100 (92–100)
(22/22)
80 (66–89)
(24/30)
100 (92–100)
(24/24)
81 (67–90)
(25/31)
 Accuracy 91 (79–97)
(41/45)
93 (82–98)
(42/45)
84 (71–92)
(38/45)
98 (88–100)
(44/45)
87 (74–94)
(39/45)
 AUC (95% CI) 0.92 (0.85–0.99) 0.94 (0.87–1.0) 0.83 (0.72–0.94) 0.98 (0.94–1.0) 0.85 (0.75–0.95)
Per-patient analysis
 Sensitivity 100 (80–100)
(12/12)
100 (80–100)
(12/12)
83 (58–95)
(10/12)
100 (80–100)
(12/12)
83 (58–95)
(10/12)
 Specificity 33 (15–58)
(1/3)
67 (42–85)
(2/3)
100 (80–100)
(3/3)
67 (42–85)
(2/3)
100 (80–100)
(3/3)
 PPV 86 (61–96)
(12/14)
92 (69–99)
(12/13)
100 (80–100)
(10/10)
92 (69–99)
(12/13)
100 (80–100)
(10/10)
 NPV 100 (80–100)
(1/1)
100 (80–100)
(2/2)
60 (36–80)
(3/5)
100 (80–100)
(2/2)
60 (36–80)
(3/5)
 Accuracy 87 (62–96)
(13/15)
93 (70–99)
(14/15)
87 (62–96)
(13/15)
93 (70–99)
(14/15)
87 (62–96)
(13/15)
 AUC (95% CI) 0.67 (0.34–0.99) 0.83 (0.51–1.0) 0.92 (0.81–1.0) 0.83 (0.51–1.0) 0.92 (0.81–1.0)

Values of sensitivities, specificities, PPVs, NPVs, and accuracies are % (95% CI). AUC = area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, CCTA = coronary computed tomography angiography, CI = confidence interval, DE-CTP = dual-energy computed tomography perfusion, NPV = negative predictive value, PPV = positive predictive value, SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography