Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 21;12(1):128–137. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw152

Table 4.

Performance of each study group on gambling tasks

Insular patients
Temporal patients
Healthy controls
Variable n Mean s.d. n Mean s.d. n Mean s.d. P-value Posthoc comparisons
IGT
 Learning phase (trials 1–40) 13 2.2 11.3 13 −3.5 8.2 20 −2.5 9.4 0.500
 Test phase (trials 41–100) 13 13.7 16.2 13 −2.5 15.9 20 18.0 21.9 0.005 C > T; I > T
Cups Task
 Sensitivity to EV − Gain 12 4.6 2.6 13 4.7 2.9 20 4.6 3.2 0.996
 Sensitivity to EV − Loss 12 4.3 2.1 13 3.6 3.5 20 6.4 2.2 0.016 C > I; C > T

Note. One participant from the insular group could not complete the Cups Task due to a lack of time during the assessment session. P-values obtained from non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis tests for differences between the three groups. Posthoc comparisons indicate the direction of significant (P < 0.05) differences revealed by non-parametric Mann–Whitney tests performed between each pair of groups. C, healthy controls; I, insular patients; T, temporal patients.