Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 9;7(4):e00670. doi: 10.1002/brb3.670

Table 2.

rs12959006 interaction with baseline‐measured anti‐HHV‐6, anti‐EBNA‐1, and anti‐EBNA‐2 IgG to predict CDMS and relapse among classic FDEs

Factor Genotype CDMS p Relapse p
N HR (95% CI) N HR (95% CI)
Baseline HHV6 CC 23 0.63 (0.14, 2.77) .54 27 0.58 (0.20, 1.64) .30
CT + TT 16 6.95 (1.11, 43.31) .04 23 3.00 (1.19, 7.53) .02
p interaction .05 p interaction .02
Baseline EBNA1 CC 23 1.30 (0.57, 2.99) .54 27 1.10 (0.57, 2.12) .77
CT + TT 16 3.01 (1.15, 7.87) .02 23 1.28 (0.88, 1.87) .19
p interaction .28 p interaction .66
Baseline EBNA2 CC 23 1.12 (0.59, 2.14) .73 27 1.13 (0.74, 1.73) .57
CT + TT 16 4.14 (1.62, 10.56) .003 23 1.52 (0.90, 2.56) .12
p interaction .19 p interaction .68

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; FDE, first demyelinating event.

Due to the smaller number people carrying TT genotype converted to CDMS (= 2), we recoded the genotype as CT + TT. Results were adjusted for age, sex and study site, and presented as HR (95% CI) for CDMS and relapse. N refers to the number of events for each related clinical course. p value <0.05 bolded.