Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 13;12(4):e0175765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175765

Fig 2. Effects of IDR and Am80 on expression of surface TF antigen.

Fig 2

Each cell line (EAhy926, HL60, NB4, and U937) was treated with IDR (A) or Am80 (B) at 37°C for 24 h. Cell surface expression of TF antigen was analyzed by flow cytometry. Data are the mean ± SD (n = 6). Significant differences are indicated by (*) for p < 0.05 compared with 0 μM, whereas (**) indicates a significant difference of p < 0.01, and (***) for p < 0.001.