Table 1.
Study | Criteria for progression |
---|---|
Dresden protocol (Raiskup-Wolf et al,31 2008) | Any of the following three: |
• Increase in Kmax ≥1.00 diopter (D) | |
• Patient’s self-report of deteriorating of visual acuity | |
• Need for new contact lens fitting more than once in 2 years | |
Wittig-Silva et al,17 2008 | One or more of the following: |
• Increase of ≥1.00 D in the steepest simulated keratometry reading (Kmax) | |
• Increase of ≥1.00 D in manifest refraction’s astigmatism | |
• Increase of ≥0.50 D in manifest refraction SE | |
• Decrease of ≥0.1 mm in back optic zone radius of the best fitting contact lens | |
Vinciguerra et al,80 2009 | Any of the following three: |
• Change in myopia and/or astigmatism of ≥3.00 D in the previous 6 months | |
• Mean central K-reading change of ≥1.50 D in 3 consecutive topographies during the previous 6 months | |
• Mean central corneal thickness decrease of ≥5% in 3 consecutive tomographies performed in the previous 6 months | |
O’Brart et al,16 2011 | Any of the following two criteria met over the previous 18 months: |
• Reduced UCDVA or CDVA by more than one line | |
• Increase of refractive or corneal astigmatism, keratometry, or cone apex power by 0.75 D | |
Hersh et al,18 2011 | One or more of the following changes over a period of 24 months: |
• Increase of ≥1.00 D in the steepest K measurement | |
• Increase of ≥1.00 D in manifest cylinder | |
• Increase of ≥0.50 D in manifest refraction SE | |
Chatzis and Hafezi,73 2012 | • Increase of ≥1.00 D in Kmax over a maximum of 12 months |
Hashemi et al,38 2013 | Any of the following criteria met during the previous 12 months: |
• Increase in Kmax, manifest cylinder error, or manifest refraction SE ≥1.00 D | |
• Loss of ≥2 lines of CDVA attributable just to keratoconus progression | |
Mazzotta et al,60 2014 | Variation of at least three of the following parameters (one clinical plus two instrumental) during a period of 4 months for patients under 18 years and 6 months for adults:a |
• Worsening of UCDVA/CDVA >0.50 Snellen lines | |
• Increase of SPH/CYL >0.50 D | |
• Increase of topographic symmetry index SAI/SI >1.00 D | |
• Increase of mean K reading >1.00 D | |
• Reduction of the thinnest point at corneal optical coherence tomography pachymetry ≥10 μm | |
Stojanovic et al,50 2014 | During a period of 12 months: |
• Increase of astigmatism or myopia ≥1.00 D or increase in average Sim K by 1.50 D | |
Shetty et al,54 2015 | • Increase in Kmax, corresponding change in the subjective refraction ≥ 1.0 D or ≥5% decrease in the thinnest pachymetry in the preceding 6 months |
Poli et al,36 2015 | • Deterioration of uncorrected (UDVA) and/or corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities >1 Snellen line, SE refraction >0.75 D, cone apex keratometry >0.75 D, and/or reduction in corneal thickness (thinnest point) >10 microns lasting more than 6 months |
Gomes et al,89 2015 | Consistent change in at least two of the following parameters: |
• Progressive steepening of the anterior corneal surface | |
• Progressive steepening of the posterior corneal surface | |
• Progressive thinning and/or an increase in the rate of corneal thickness change from the periphery to the thinnest point | |
• No specific values were given because the panel considered them to be specific for each device | |
• In addition, the panelists also indicated that CXL could be indicated for the treatment of KCN with a perceived risk of progression even if it had not been documented | |
Godefrooij et al,110 2016 | • Increase of ≥1.00 D in the steepest K measurement within 6–12 months |
Note:
The follow-up period was obtained from personal communication from the authors (Mazzotta et al, unpublished data, January 2, 2017).
Abbreviations: Kmax, maximum keratometry; SE, spherical equivalent; UCDVA, uncorrected distance visual acuity; CDVA, corrected distance visual acuity; SAI, surface asymmetry index; SI, superior-inferior symmetry index.