Table 1.
Reference | Application | Study design | Country | Study focus | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Neubauer et al3 | CPOE/CDS | Noncontrolled intervention | Austria | Mobile CDS for glycemic management of inpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus | Insulin adherence improved and providers felt that CDS prevented medication errors |
Faine et al4 | CPOE/CDS | Pre/postintervention | USA | CPOE-based CDS for appropriate vancomycin dosing | CDS increased weight-based doses, but it was not statistically significant |
Lee et al5 | CPOE/CDS | Pre/postintervention | Republic of Korea | High-alert medication clinical decision support system on order entry errors | CDS significantly reduced omitted fluids and excessive doses |
Galanter et al6 | CPOE/CDS | Observational | USA | Prevention of sound-similar medication orders with “indication missing” CDS | Errors were reduced, but the impact of the CDS depended on the medication |
Vermeulen et al7 | CPOE/CDS | Economic evaluation | The Netherlands | Cost of reducing adverse drug events | CDS costs more than a paper method, but the costs for reducing errors are acceptable |
Micek et al8 | CPOE/CDS | Controlled intervention | USA | Mobile CDS to reduce inappropriate antibiotic therapy of serious health care–associated infections | The CDS resulted in more inappropriate initial therapy than the nonalert group |
Armada et al9 | CPOE/CDS | Pre/postintervention | Spain | Evaluate the effects of a CPOE system with CDS in detecting prescription errors | The system was successful in reducing prescription errors in a cardiac intensive care unit setting |
Hackl et al10 | CPOE/CDS | Controlled series analysis | Austria | Investigate the usage and acceptance of ADE scorecards by health care professionals and their impact on rates of possible ADEs | Scorecards may raise provider awareness of ADEs but not decrease the occurrence |
Falck et al11 | CPOE/CDS | Observational | USA | Measure the accuracy and completeness of electronic problem list additions using indication-based prescribing of antihypertensives | Indication-based prescribing produced accurate problem placement |
Abramson et al12 | CPOE/CDS | Mixed-methods cross-sectional case study | USA | Assess the rates and types of errors after transition to CPOE with CDS | Commercial CPOE with CDS reduced errors, but alert firings need to be managed carefully |
Galanter et al13 | CPOE/CDS | Observational | USA | Determine whether indication-based computer order entry alerts intercept wrong-patient medication errors | Indication-based ordering can identify wrong-patient errors |
Pruszydlo et al14 | CPOE/CDS | Intervention | Germany | Evaluate a CDS system for drug substitutions | CDS was able to automatically switch ~92% of medications |
Maat et al15 | CPOE/CDS | Pre/postintervention | The Netherlands | Evaluation of the impact of a CPOE with CDS for glucose control in neonatal intensive care patients | CPOE with CDS had no impact on hypo- or hyperglycemia |
Chapman et al16 | CPOE/CDS | Pre/postintervention | USA | Determine the impact of CPOE on workflow in the neonatal intensive care unit | Order verification time improved, but administration times did not |
Milani et al17 | CPOE/CDS | Controlled trial | USA | Evaluate CPOE with CDS on the frequency of antithrombotic medication errors and in-hospital bleeding in patients with chronic kidney disease admitted with acute coronary syndrome | CPOE with CDS may be effective in improving patient safety |
Wetterneck et al18 | CPOE/CDS | Pre/postintervention | USA | Evaluate the incidence of duplicate medication orders before and after CPOE with CDS implementation | CPOE implementation increased duplicate medication orders |
Roberts et al19 | CPOE/CDS | Observational | USA | CPOE with advanced CDS on the identification of potential ADEs at medication ordering stage was studied | More potential ADEs were identified, but many were false positives |
Kazemi et al20 | CPOE/CDS | Observational | Iran | Evaluate effect CPOE and CDS in reducing medication dosing errors | Including CDS reduced errors beyond CPOE without CDS |
Terrell et al21 | CPOE/CDS | Randomized controlled trial | USA | Evaluate CDS to reduce the rate of excessive medication dosing for patients with renal impairment | CDS reduces excessive doses for patients with lower creatinine clearance |
Seidling et al22 | CPOE/CDS | Pre/postintervention | Germany | CDS providing upper dose limits personalized to individual patient characteristics | Excessive doses were significantly reduced |
Chen et al23 | CPOE/CDS | Controlled trial | Taiwan | Hyperlipidemia treatment guidelines in a CDS | CDS improved percentage of patients reaching low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals |
Kadmon et al24 | CPOE/CDS | Observational | Israel | Decrease in prescription errors and ADEs using a CPOE with CDS | Pediatric intensive care unit errors and potential ADEs were reduced with CDS use |
Terrell et al25 | CPOE/CDS | Randomized controlled trial | USA | Evaluate CDS to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing to older adults | CDS with alternative medications can reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing |
Galanter et al26 | CPOE/CDS | Observational | USA | Evaluate alerts to add a diagnosis to the problem list | CDS led to more correct problems being added to problem lists |
Turchin et al27 | CPOE/CDS | Cross-sectional survey | USA | Evaluate inpatient computerized medication reconciliation system | Users valued the system but wanted tighter integration |
Mahoney et al28 | CPOE/CDS | Pre/postintervention | USA | Evaluate the impact of CPOE with CDS on medication errors throughout the medication use process | Implementation reduced errors through the process and for specific patient populations |
Vardi et al29 | CPOE/CDS | Observational | Israel | Evaluate the impact of a CPOE/CDS on the frequency of errors in ordering and form completion time | There was a 100% reduction in errors and time required was significantly reduced |
Abboud et al30 | CPOE/CDS | Pre/postintervention | USA | Examine a CDS for pediatric aminoglycoside laboratory monitoring | CDS did not significantly increase laboratory monitoring |
Eslami et al31 | CPOE/CDS | Observational | The Netherlands | Investigate the effects of a CPOE/CDS system with initial default dose on the frequency of medication errors and potential ADEs | More initial doses followed the CDS recommendation, but the recommendation is too high for patients with renal insufficiency |
Cornu et al32 | Alerts | Pre/postintervention | Belgium | Evaluate context-specific drug-drug interaction alerting system on alert acceptance | Redesigned alerts with context-specific information improved alert acceptance |
Stultz et al33 | Alerts | Observational | USA | Determine the sensitivity and specificity of an alert system for dosing errors | Customization of alerts improves sensitivity and specificity of alerts |
Woods et al34 | Alerts | Pre/postintervention | USA | Detection and warning of atypical medication orders | Historical data can improve specificity of alerts |
Boussadi et al35 | Alerts | Observational | France | Assess the diagnostic performance of an alert system for renally cleared drug dosing control | Alerts captured more issues and had fewer errors than pharmacists reviewing medication orders |
Myers et al36 | Alerts | Randomized controlled trial | USA | Assess computerized alerts designed to reduce medication abbreviations could reduce abbreviations in physician handwritten notes | Knowledge of abbreviations did not improve, but providers with forced correction of abbreviations in computerized notes had the greatest reduction in handwritten abbreviation use |
Strom et al37 | Alerts | Randomized controlled trial | USA | Evaluate the effectiveness of a nearly hard-stop alert for drug interactions | Hard-stop alerts can be effective in changing prescribing, but can lead to delays in care |
Turchin et al38 | Alerts | Pseudo-randomized controlled trial | USA | Determine whether interruptive alerts will increase utilization of several functionalities | Alerts doubled the use of promoted functionalities |
Strom et al39 | Alerts | Randomized controlled trial | USA | Evaluate the incremental effectiveness of an alert that required a response from the provider | Requiring a provider response did not improve desired ordering |
Hamad et al40 | Calculator | Pre/postintervention | UK | Evaluate impact of online dose calculators on initial dose accuracy | Calculators significantly improved initial antibiotic dosing |
Dingley et al41 | Calculator | Randomized controlled trial | UK | Evaluate calculation of fluid requirements in pediatric burns | An electronic calculator produced fewer calculation errors than other methods |
Abbreviations: ADE, adverse drug event; CDS, clinical decision support; CPOE, computerized provider order entry.