Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 14;8(11):18238–18247. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15315

Table 2. Univariate analysis of predictors of tumour progression.

Variable Cut-off level/categories HR 95% CI P value
Tumour focality uni vs. multifocal 2.25 0.92-5.52 0.0768
Tumour size ≤3 cm vs. >3 cm 1.69 0.66-4.33 0.2718
BCG treatment no vs yes 1.29 0.56-2.98 0.5546
Stage1 Ta vs. T1 1.06 0.72-1.56 0.7738
Grade1 LG vs. HG 1.85 0.75-4.54 0.1792
Concomitant CIS without CIS vs. CIS 1 0.34-2.95 0.9974
miR-140-5p −4.4 2.89 1.13-7.39 0.0267*
miR-142-3p 1.01 3.09 1.26-7.6 0.0139*
miR-18a-3p −7.02 4.40 1.72-11.29 0.0020*
miR-92a-3p −0.555 5.35 1.81-15.53 0.0025*
miR-125b-5p −1.74 0.60 0.23-1.53 0.2813
miR-204-5p −5.15 0.93 0.39-2.21 0.8612

Results of dichotomous clinical variables are expressed considering category placed in second term as the reference category

1The grade and stage of the tumours were determined according to WHO criteria [38] and TNM classification [39], respectively.

*Statistically significant

Abbreviations: CIS, Carcinoma in situ; LG, Low grade; HG, High grade; BCG, Bacillus Calmette-Guerin; HR, hazard ratio; 95%CI, confidence interval.