Table 2.
Correlation of peak and mean eosinophil counts between pathology trainees
| Path 1 | Path 2 | Path 3 | Path 4 | Path 5 | Path 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For peak eosinophil countsa | ||||||
| Path 1 | -- | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.89 |
| Path 2 | -- | -- | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.78 |
| Path 3 | -- | -- | -- | 0.86 | 0.91 | 0.86 |
| Path 4 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 0.89 | 0.87 |
| Path 5 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 0.90 |
| Path 6 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| For mean eosinophil countsb | ||||||
| Path 1 | -- | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.92 |
| Path 2 | -- | -- | 0.91 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.79 |
| Path 3 | -- | -- | -- | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.83 |
| Path 4 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 0.94 | 0.93 |
| Path 5 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 0.96 |
| Path 6 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Values represent Pearson’s R
a
all p < 0.001;
b
all p < 0.001