Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 25;13(2):144–154. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2017.13.2.144

Table 1. Demographics of the subjects.

CN (n=20) EMCI (n=17) LMCI (n=20) AD (n=20) Post-hoc comparisons
Female 11 (55.0) 4 (23.5) 6 (30.0) 10 (50.0)
Age (years) 69.9±3.3 67.8±5.3 69.2±4.8 68.3±4.3
Education (years) 16.6±2.8 16.2±2.6 16.1±2.7 15.7±2.4
GCDR 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.8±0.3 CN<EMCI=LMCI<AD
MMSE 28.9±1.1 28.4±1.4 27.2±1.9 23.5±1.9 CN=EMCI=LMCI<AD
MADAS-Cog* 7.3±3.1 14.7±6.7 20.4±6.1 28.3±9.8 CN<EMCI<LMCI<AD
Logical Memory I: immediate recall 13.3±3.0 10.5±2.3 5.8±3.1 3.5±2.0 CN<EMCI<LMCI<AD
Logical Memory II: delayed recall 11.8±3.3 9.2±1.4 2.5±2.9 1.6±2.0 CN<EMCI<LMCI=AD
Florbetapir+* 3 (17.6) 5 (31.3) 14 (82.4) 20 (100.0) CN=EMCI<LMCI<AD
42 (µg/mL)* 210.9±54.3 186.8±56.5 161.8±55.3 124.1±25.7 CN=EMCI<LMCI<AD
p-tau (µg/mL)* 29.7±9.2 36.2±31.7 59.1±30.1 76.0±40.0 CN=EMCI<LMCI=AD

Data are n (%) or mean±SD values. There were no gender, age, or education intergroup differences. Two-sample t-tests (p<0.01) between groups were used for post-hoc analysis. MMSE scores in CN, EMCI, and LMCI did not show significant differences. Logical Memory II: delayed recall in LMCI and AD did not show a significant difference. Florbetapir and CSF biomarkers in CN and EMCI did not show a significant difference.

*Missing data: (MADAS-Cog) 3 CN, 1 EMCI, 2 LMCI, 1 AD. (Florbetapir) 3 CN, 1 EMCI, 3 LMCI. (CSF biomarkers) 7 CN, 2 EMCI, 3 LMCI, 3 AD.

AD: Alzheimer's disease, CN: cognitive normal, EMCI: early mild cognitive impairment, GCDR: global Clinical Dementia Rating, LMCI: late mild cognitive impairment, MADAS-Cog: Modified Alzheimers Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale, MMSE: Mini Mental State Examination.