Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 5;96(4):984–993. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0558

Table 3.

ORs comparing achievement of WASH targets among pupils attending 200 Malian primary schools

aOR (95% CI) P P trend
Roll call absence
 WASH components model* n/a
  Sanitation target 0.97 (0.76–1.22) 0.77
  Water supply target 0.90 (0.73–1.10) 0.32
  Handwashing target 1.37 (1.01–1.84) 0.04
  WASH supplies target 0.98 (0.74–1.30) 0.91
 Achievement of WASH targets model* 0.14
  0 targets met Referent
  > 0–1 targets met 0.94 (0.76–1.18) 0.62
  > 1–2 targets met 0.90 (0.72–1.14) 0.39
  > 2–3 targets met 1.18 (0.94–1.49) 0.14
  > 3–4 targets met 1.06 (0.81–1.39) 0.65
Pupil-reported absence
 WASH components model* n/a
  Sanitation target 0.96 (0.74–1.24) 0.76
  Water supply target 1.04 (0.84–1.31) 0.69
  Handwashing target 0.79 (0.57–1.09) 0.15
  WASH supplies target 1.13 (0.83–1.53) 0.43
 Achievement of WASH targets model* 0.41
  0 targets met Referent
  > 0–1 targets met 0.85 (0.67–1.08) 0.19
  > 1–2 targets met 0.90 (0.70–1.15) 0.40
  > 2–3 targets met 0.91 (0.71–1.17) 0.47
  > 3–4 targets met 0.83 (0.62–1.11) 0.20

aOR = adjusted odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; WASH = water, sanitation, and hygiene.

*

The adjusted model controlled for educational district matching cluster, time of year, school enrollment, urban or rural zone, pupil grade, and pupil sex, and for clustering of pupils within schools and for repeated measures of pupils over time.