Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb;99(2):101–106. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0340

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies

Study Year Design Patients (n) LNR cut-off points(%) NPN n (range) TNE n (range)
Pawlik et al.24 2007 Prospective 905 0, 20, 40 17 (6–28)
House et al.16 2007 Prospective 696 0, 20, 40 4 ± 3 17 ± 9.5
Riediger et al.25 2009 Retrospective 182 0, 20, 30 1 (0–22) 16 (2–47)
Massucco et al.22 2009 Prospective 77 10 4 (1–29) 29 (10–54)
Showalter et al.28 2010 RCT 445 15, 33 1 (0–18) 9–11 (1–56)
Bhatti et al.14 2010 Retrospective 84 20, 30 9 (1–26)
Murakami et al.23 2010 Retrospective 119 0, 10, 20 2 (0–40) 28 (2–75)
La Torre et al.18 2011 Retrospective 101 0, 20, 40 19 (3–26)
Sanjay et al.27 2012 Prospective 51 20
Robinson et al.26 2012 Retrospective 134 15
Ausborn et al.13 2013 Retrospective 106 0.095 (0.0–0.26) median
John et al.17 2013 Retrospective 70 14 2 14
Yamamoto et al.30 2014 Retrospective 56 20 2 25
Strobel et al.29 2014 Prospective 811 0, 20, 40 3 (1–7) 24 (18–32)
La Torre et al.19 2014 Retrospective 143 0, 20, 30 ≥ 1 15
Liu et al.20 2014 Retrospective 167 20, 40 2 (1–27) 10 (0–44)
Malleo et al.21 2015 Retrospective 255 0, 20, 40 4.9 ± 4.7 30.8 ± 14
Zhan et al.31 2015 Retrospective 83 20 8.2 ± 6.1
Fischer et al.15 2016 Retrospective 398 19 2 (1–25)

LNR, lymph node ratio; NPN, number of positive nodes; RCT, randomised controlled trial; TNE, total nodes examined