Table 1.
Trait | Environment | Zheng58 | Chang7-2 | MP | F1 | MPH (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH | E1 | 183.19 ± 10.03 | 199.86 ± 8.47**,a | 191.52 | 268.75 ± 12.61**,b | 40.32c |
E2 | 148.28 ± 11.40 | 175.32 ± 11.93** | 161.80 | 209.67 ± 9.84** | 29.59 | |
E3 | 175.37 ± 7.88 | 205.21 ± 11.97** | 190.29 | 247.20 ± 12.77** | 29.91 | |
E4 | 161.19 ± 7.63 | 210.50 ± 6.27** | 185.84 | 247.97 ± 8.57** | 33.43 | |
E5 | 180.52 ± 8.36 | 215.01 ± 6.88** | 197.77 | 247.75 ± 6.96** | 25.27 | |
EH | E1 | 68.90 ± 7.95 | 102.81 ± 10.25** | 85.86 | 123.58 ± 10.04** | 43.94 |
E2 | 45.63 ± 3.86 | 84.03 ± 6.09** | 64.83 | 86.73 ± 7.72** | 33.78 | |
E3 | 61.14 ± 6.65 | 101.26 ± 9.40** | 81.20 | 114.26 ± 8.28** | 40.71 | |
E4 | 51.07 ± 5.65 | 101.13 ± 2.86** | 76.10 | 105.56 ± 4.84** | 38.71 | |
E5 | 61.41 ± 5.57 | 104.43 ± 6.43** | 82.92 | 104.23 ± 5.98** | 25.70 |
** P ≤ 0.01
aComparison between Zheng 58 and Chang 7–2 using t test; bComparison between midparent (MP) and F1 using t test, cMid-parent heterosis (MPH): (F1-MP)/MP × 100