Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 17;17:275. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3271-z

Table 2.

Characteristics of PET protocol

Study NO. of patients Patients with FDG-avid tumor Correction of SUV Blood glucose level(mg/dl) Fasting time(h) Uptake time(min) Injected dose of FDG(MBq) Type of the PET engine Reconstruction method Attenuation correction
Stahl 2003 [4] 40 24 (60%) Body weight unknown 6 h 40 300 Siemens filter back-projection ND
Mochiki 2004 [14] 85 64 (75.2%) Body weight unknown 4 h 40 275–370 SET 2400 W instrument OS-EM ND
Chung 2010 [23] 35 35 (100%) Body weight <120 NDM‚ <200 DM 6 h Unknown 4.8/kg GPS LOR CT
Park, 2012 [16] 82 82 (100%) Body weight ≦130 4 h 60 unknown GPS OSEM and 3-D RAMLA CT
Lee 2012 [15] 271 149 (55%) Body mass unknown 6 h 60 5.18 /kg GPS OS-EM CT
Kim 2014 [24] 97 50 (51.5%) Body weight <130 NDM‚ <200 DM 6 h 50–60 3.7–5.5/kg Biograph Truepoint 40 Unknown CT
Lee 2015 [12] 279 223 (80%) Body mass unknown 4 h 60 370 for APS Lee 2015 [12] OS-EM CT
Song2015 [26] 151 122 (81%) Body weight <150 6 h 60 5.5/kg DPS OS-EM CT

Abbreviations: NDM no diabetes mellitus, DM diabetes mellitus, OS-EM ordered subset expectation maximization, 3-D RAMLA row action maximum likelihood algorithm, LOR response algorithm, ND not determined, APS advanced pet scanner, GPS Gemini Philip scanner, DSS discovery ste scanner