Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 17;17:272. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3258-9

Table 1.

Comparison of value estimates obtained in tests and re-testsa, by weighting technique, comparator and country

Comparator Weighting technique France Italy Spain
Mean test (SD) Mean re-test (SD) Mean test (SD) Mean re-test (SD) Mean test (SD) Mean re-test (SD)
vs watchful waiting 5-point weighting scale 0.22 (0.14) 0.32 (0.13) 0.33 (0.14) 0.31 (0.10) 0.30 (0.11) 0.29 (0.07)
ICC (3,1) = 0.732 ICC (3,1) = 0.511 ICC (3,1) = 0.628
Hierarchical point allocation 0.24 (0.13) 0.33 (0.17) 0.34 (0.15) 0.36 (0.20) 0.38 (0.20) 0.31 (0.15)
ICC (3,1) = 0.913 ICC (3,1) = 0.668 ICC (3,1) = 0.877
vs sorafenib 5-point weighting scale 0.31 (0.14) 0.29 (0.11) 0.35 (0.16) 0.34 (0.12) 0.36 (0.11) 0.31 (0.09)
ICC (3,1) = 0.832 ICC (3,1) = 0.437 ICC (3,1) = 0.724
Hierarchical point allocation 0.32 (0.16) 0.30 (0.18) 0.37 (0.15) 0.36 (0.20) 0.41 (0.18) 0.33 (0.15)
ICC (3,1) = 0.772 ICC (3,1) = 0.649 ICC (3,1) = 0.865

ICC intra-rater correlation coefficient, SD standard deviation

aTest-retest data were available for 5 panelists from France, 7 from Italy and 7 from Spain