Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2017 Feb 24;1860(4):482–490. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2017.02.008

Table 1.

Kinetic network parameters.

Transition States Forward rate Backward rate Source

Cognate Mismatch Cognate Mismatch

Bulk entry to secondary pore bulk – H 0.75 μs−1 M−1 3.8 μs−1 MSM/Exp.[40]
bulk – F 1.35 μs−1 M−1 0.55 μs−1 MSM/Exp.[40]
bulk – T 1.42 μs−1 M−1 0.18 μs−1 MSM/Exp.[40]
Secondary pore dynamics H – F 6.8 μs−1 1.2 μs−1 MSM
F – T 5.2 μs−1 1.5 μs−1 MSM
T – G 0.76 μs−1 0.28 μs−1 MSM
F – G 2.8 μs−1 0.58 μs−1 MSM
E site binding G – E 3.4 μs−1 1.8 μs−1 MSM
Active site binding E – A 13.1 μs−1 0.08 μs−1 25.8 μs−1 MD[18]
Trigger loop closing A – C 150 s−1 15–150 sc−1 5 s−1 5–4,450 s−1 MD[41]/Exp.[17]
NTP incorporation C – R 35 s−1 0.7 s−1 0 0 Exp.[15, 40]

Transitions and associated kinetic rates used in kinetic network model. If no rate is given for mismatch bases, the rates for cognate bases were applied. Rates estimated directly from MD have a lower limit of about 0.25 μs−1 based on the total aggregate simulation time used for constructing the MSM model.