Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 30;99(11):4003–4014. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2900

Table 4.

Meta-Analysis of IGF-1-Defined Outcomes as Compared Between Surgical and Medical Interventions

Outcomes Effect Size 95% CI I2, % Heterogeneity P Value P Value (Interaction)
Remission by cutoff criteriaa
    Medical interventions 0.45 (0.32, 0.63) 86.3 .000 .14
    Surgical interventions 0.64 (0.54, 0.76) 83.9 .000
Remission by IGF-1 FUT ≤24 moa
    Medical interventions 0.45 (0.25, 0.81) 84.8 .000 .49
    Surgical interventions 0.58 (0.38, 0.88) 93.3 .000
FUT ≥24 moa
    Medical interventions 0.44 (0.31, 0.63) 72.5 .026 .24
    Surgical interventions 0.56 (0.45, 0.68) 81.4 .000
IGF-1 levelsb
    Medical interventions −329.72 (−496.73, 162.71) 76.4 .000 .14
    Surgical interventions −549.17 (−791.67, −306.67) 38.8 .195
IGF-I levels FUT ≤24 mob
    Medical interventions −355.34 (−457.54, −253.15) 0.0 .866 .65
    Surgical interventions −412.06 (−637.14, −186.98) 0.0 .661
IGF-1 levels FUT ≥24 mob
    Medical interventions −251 (−627.30, 125.26) 85.9 .001 .04
    Surgical interventions −731 (−1007.23, −454.77) NA NA
Tumor sizeb
    Microadenomac −311.97 (−571.66, −52.28) 0.0 .816 .80
    Macroadenomac −280.38 (−456.44, −104.32) 0.0 .893

Abbreviations: FUT, follow-up time; NA, not applicable (not possible to calculate heterogeneity because the result was based on a single study).

a

Cumulative incidence.

b

Weighted mean difference (micrograms per liter).

c

Medical interventions only.