Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar;9(3):742–756. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.07

Table S7. Pattern of failure after SABR for primary lung cancer in selected literature.

Study (year) Total No. of failure LF, n (%) RF, n (%) DF, n (%) LF + RF, n (%) LF + DF, n (%) RF + DF, n (%) LF + RF + DF, n (%)
Baumann 2006 (34) 44 4 (9.0) 3 (7.0) 22 (50.0) 2 (4.0) 9 (20.0) 3 (7.0) 1 (2.0)
Guckenberger 2009 (6) 18 1 (2.0) 4 (10.0) 11 (27.0) 0 0 2 (5.0) 0
Bradely 2010 (35) 21 3 (14.0) 1 (5.0] 10 (47.0) 2 (10.0) 1 (5.0) 3 (14.0) 1 (5.0)
Olsen 2011 (36) 25 4 (16.0) 7 (28.0) 6 (24.0) 3 (12.0) 0 4 (16.0) 1 (4.0)
Haasbeck 2011 (37) 17 1 (6.0) 0 10 (59.0) 1 (6.0) 1 (6.0) 3 (17.0) 1 (6.0)
Taremi 2012 (38) 31 7 (22.0) 6 (19.0) 12 (39.0) 1 (3.0) 1 (3.0) 3 (9.0) 1 (3.0)
Lee 2013 (39) 21 4 (19.0) 1 (95.0) 8 (38.0) 1 (5.0) 3 (14.0) 3 (14.0) 1 (5.0)
Presented study 40 6 (15.0) 6 (15.0) 12 (30.0) 1 (2.5) 5 (12.5) 5 (12.5) 5 (12.5)
   PLLs 22 4 (18.0) 3 (13.0) 3 (13.0) 1 (5.0) 1 (5.0) 5 (23.0) 5 (23.0)
   MLLs 18 2 (11.0) 3 (17.0) 9 (50.0) 0 4 (22.0) 0 0

SABR, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy; LF, local failure; RF, regional failure; DF, distant failure; PLLs, primary lung lesions; MLLs, metastatic lung lesions.