Table 3.
Exploratory factor analysisa |
Confirmatory factor analysisb |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Civic participation (F1) | Social cohesion (F2) | Reciprocity (F3) | Civic participation (F1) | Social cohesion (F2) | Reciprocity (F3) | |
Volunteer group | 0.536 | 0.119 | −0.029 | 0.557 | – | – |
Sports group | 0.791 | −0.015 | 0.100 | 0.796 | – | – |
Hobby activity | 0.868 | −0.020 | 0.021 | 0.867 | – | – |
Study or cultural group | 0.706 | −0.023 | −0.051 | 0.693 | – | – |
Skills teaching | 0.536 | 0.003 | −0.060 | 0.532 | – | – |
Community trust | 0.055 | 0.934 | −0.009 | – | 0.947 | – |
Norms of reciprocity | −0.058 | 0.817 | −0.015 | – | 0.790 | – |
Community attachment | 0.055 | 0.716 | 0.007 | – | 0.727 | – |
Received emotional support | −0.092 | −0.005 | 0.831 | – | – | 0.828 |
Provided emotional support | 0.104 | −0.097 | 0.750 | – | – | 0.682 |
Received instrumental support | −0.061 | 0.257 | 0.486 | – | – | 0.603 |
Correlation coefficient | ||||||
F1 & F2 | 0.154 (p = 0.000) | 0.178 (p = 0.000) | ||||
F1 & F3 | 0.065 (p = 0.087) | 0.031 (p = 0.495) | ||||
F2 & F3 | 0.436 (p = 0.000) | 0.392 (p = 0.000) |
Exploratory factor analysis was applied promax rotation and maximum likelihood method.
Model fit indicators of confirmatory factor analysis were as follows: Chi-square (df) = 271.2(41), p < 0.001, RMSEA = 0.089, CFI = 0.925, TLI = 0.899, SRMR = 0.058.