Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 4;27(5):221–227. doi: 10.1016/j.je.2016.06.005

Table 5.

Estimated prevalence ratios from multilevel Poisson regression analysis.

Self-rated health (fair/poor)
Depressive symptoms (GDS ≥5)
Model 1
PR (95% CI)
Model 2
PR (95% CI)
Model 3
PR (95% CI)
Model 1
PR (95% CI)
Model 2
PR (95% CI)
Model 3
PR (95% CI)
Fixed parameters
Community level variables
 Civic participation (factor score) 0.94*** (0.92–0.96) 0.96*** (0.94–0.98) 0.97** (0.95–0.99) 0.94*** (0.92–0.95) 0.95*** (0.93–0.97) 0.95*** (0.93–0.97)
 Social cohesion (factor score) 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 1.03* (1.01–1.05) 1.03 (0.99–1.07) 0.97** (0.95–0.99) 1.02* (1.00–1.04) 1.03 (1.00–1.06)
 Reciprocity (factor score) 0.98 (0.97–1.01) 1.00 (0.98–1.03) 1.02 (0.95–1.09) 0.96*** (0.95–0.98) 0.98* (0.96–1.00) 1.03 (0.98–1.09)
Individual-level variables
 Civic participation (0–3) 0.74*** (0.72–0.76) 0.74*** (0.72–0.76) 0.76*** (0.75–0.78) 0.76*** (0.75–0.78)
 Social cohesion (0–3) 0.84*** (0.83–0.85) 0.84*** (0.83–0.85) 0.77*** (0.76–0.77) 0.77*** (0.76–0.77)
 Reciprocity (0–3) 0.86*** (0.84–0.88) 0.86*** (0.84–0.88) 0.82*** (0.80–0.83) 0.82*** (0.80–0.83)
Cross-level interactions
 Community level civic participation × Individual level civic participation 0.98 (0.95–1.00) 1.01 (0.98–1.03)
 Community level social cohesion × Individual level social cohesion 1.00 (0.98–1.02) 0.99 (0.98–1.01)
 Community level reciprocity × Individual level reciprocity 0.99 (0.97–1.02) 0.98* (0.96–1.00)
Random parameters
Community level intercept variance (standard error) 0.004 (0.002) 0.004 (0.002) 0.003 (0.002) 0.001 (0.001) <0.001 <0.001
Community level civic participation slope variance (standard error) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Community level social cohesion slope variance (standard error) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Community level reciprocity slope variance (standard error) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

CI, confidence interval; GDS, geriatric depression scale; PR, prevalence ratio.

***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05.

All models are also adjusted for individual-level age, gender, marital status, education, and annual house income. Unknown cases in social capital variables and dependent variables were eliminated in this analysis. Sample size of model 1 was as follows: SRH; individual = 119,458, community = 702, GDS; individual = 101,348, community = 702. Sample size of model 2 and model 3 were as follows: SRH; individual = 88,436, community = 702, GDS; individual = 79,081, community = 702.