Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 11;8:14935. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14935

Figure 2. Relaxation of shear stress.

Figure 2

Relaxations of the rescaled ZFC shear stress Inline graphic (filled symbols) and the rescaled FC shear stress Inline graphic (open symbols) show different behaviours at (a) Inline graphic=0.670 and (b) Inline graphic=0.688, corresponding to the pink plus and cross in Fig. 1, respectively (the Gardner transition density Inline graphicG=0.684(1) (ref. 34)). We show results for several different waiting time tw, under an instantaneous increment of shear strain γ=10−3. Data are averaged over many realizations of compressed glasses obtained from a single equilibrated sample at Inline graphicg=0.643 with N=1,000 particles. Here the rescaled remanent stress Inline graphic is measured in the ZFC protocol at Inline graphic, after the longest waiting time tw=1,000 and before the shear strain is applied. The difference Inline graphic quickly vanishes and does not show significant tw dependence at (c) Inline graphic=0.670, while it decays much slower and shows a strong tw-dependent ageing effect at (d) Inline graphic=0.688. Note that by definition, Inline graphic is a one variable function, but we plot it here as Inline graphic to compare it with Inline graphic. The pressure p is independent of time and protocol, in both cases (see Supplementary Fig. 11). The error bars denote the s.e.m.