Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Diabetol. 2017 Jan 9;54(4):373–381. doi: 10.1007/s00592-016-0958-6

Table 3.

Linear regression of log fasting insulin and HbA1C, modeling separately as a function of MetS Z-score and BMI Z-score overall and by race/ethnicity and gender.

MetS Z-Score
BMI Z-Score
n HbA1c Fasting Insulin HbA1c Fasting Insulin
Slope
Estimate (CI)
r Slope
Estimate (CI)
r Slope
Estimate (CI)
r Slope
Estimate (CI)
r




All
 Overall 5033 0.027*
(0.011, 0.043)
0.077 0.456**
(0.424, 0.488)
0.497 0.025*
(0.013, 0.037)
0.095 0.355**
(0.331, 0.379)
0.522
 Males 2639 0.014
(−0.010,0.038)
0.045 0.515**
(0.471, 0.558)
0.550 0.021
(0.005, 0.036)
0.084 0.384**
(0.349, 0.419)
0.567
 Females 2394 0.041*
(0.019,0.062)
0.114 0.441**
(0.389, 0.493)
0.484 0.031*
(0.014, 0.047)
0.114 0.315**
(0.281, 0.349)
0.467

NHW
 Overall 1477 0.018
(−0.005, 0.041)
0.055 0.419**
(0.375, 0.464)
0.480 0.012
(−0.005, 0.029)
0.055 0.326**
(0.293, 0.359)
0.500
 Males 783 0.012
(−0.020,0.044)
0.032 0.524**
(0.463, 0.585)
0.577 0.012
(−0.009, 0.034)
0.055 0.380**
(0.332, 0.428)
0.575
 Females 694 0.023
(−0.009,0.055)
0.063 0.364**
(0.284, 0.444)
0.415 0.012
(−0.011, 0.034)
0.045 0.256**
(0.207, 0.305)
0.401
NHB
 Overall 1542 0.074**
(0.047,0.100)
0.167 0.546**
(0.490, 0.602)
0.534 0.045**
(0.023, 0.066)
0.141 0.392**
(0.354, 0.431)
0.534
 Males 849 0.0600*
(0.018,0.101)
0.126 0.523**
(0.433, 0.612)
0.501 0.039*
(0.011, 0.067)
0.122 0.386**
(0.336, 0.437)
0.539
 Females 693 0.089**
(0.052,0.127)
0.226 0.560**
(0.482, 0.638)
0.575 0.055*
(0.026, 0.085)
0.182 0.381**
(0.314, 0.449)
0.514
Hispanic
 Overall 2014 0.036*
(0.015,0.057)
0.110 0.507**
(0.461, 0.553)
0.534 0.031**
(0.016, 0.047)
0.122 0.397**
(0.351, 0.444)
0.561
 Males 1007 0.029
(−0.002,0.060)
0.084 0.530**
(0.467, 0.594)
0.547 0.023
(0, 0.045)
0.095 0.388**
(0.325, 0.451)
0.562
 Females 1007 0.041*
(0.012,0.070)
0.118 0.517**
(0.459, 0.575)
0.559 0.044*
(0.021, 0.067)
0.167 0.406**
(0.355, 0.456)
0.563

significant interaction between MetS Z and sex

*

p<0.01;

**

<0.0001