Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 18;4(2):021104. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.4.2.021104

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Impact of time-lagged rCBF on rCMRO2 with different time lags (0.8 s, 1.6 s, 2.2 s, 2.4 s): (a) amount of information shared between rCBF and rCMRO2 measured by MI, (b) TE indicates the amount of information exchanged from rCBF to rCMRO2 and vice versa with different time lags, (c) DI indicates the dominant direction of the transfer, the negative sign indicates the dominance of rCMRO2 over rCBF and vice versa.