Table 1.
Numerical comparison between the averaged performance of Algorithm 1 and ADMM2
Alg. 1 (α = 1) | Alg. 1 (α = 1.9) | ADMM2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Scheme 1 | CPU time(s) | 100.54 | 72.25 | 141.86 |
Objective Value | 2.1826 | 2.1998 | 2.2018 | |
Violations | 0.0081 | 0.0073 | 0.0182 | |
| ||||
Scheme 2 | CPU time(s) | 54.70 | 28.33 | 481.44 |
Objective Value | 14.3276 | 14.3345 | 14.2787 | |
Violations | 0.0099 | 0.0098 | 0.0183 | |
| ||||
Scheme 3 | CPU time(s) | 49.67 | 27.94 | 223.15 |
Objective Value | 2.4569 | 2.4537 | 2.4912 | |
Violations | 0.0078 | 0.0080 | 0.0176 |